<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vanderbilts ruins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://perassi.org/2009/07/12/vanderbilts-ruins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://perassi.org/2009/07/12/vanderbilts-ruins/</link>
	<description>English scratches and Italian notes written by Carlo Perassi</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:12:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Jaquith</title>
		<link>http://perassi.org/2009/07/12/vanderbilts-ruins/comment-page-1/#comment-5385</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Jaquith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 06:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perassi.org/?p=1094#comment-5385</guid>
		<description>In a way, I do. It&#039;s harder now to find people who are &quot;out and proud&quot; about their successes and their right to the property they&#039;ve earned, like the Vanderbilts were. Most people have trended toward some sense of partial public ownership of their assets and talents.

I&#039;m not interested in pragmatic views of economics. Pragmatism in this regard leads to attempts to engineer economic outcomes by immorally shackling people. &quot;To achieve X, we need to interfere with people&#039;s lives thusly.&quot; I come at it from the other side: &lt;em&gt;Laissez-faire&lt;/em&gt;, or economic liberalism is the only philosophy that doesn&#039;t prevent humans from living as independent rational beings. Let the chips fall where they may.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a way, I do. It&#8217;s harder now to find people who are &#8220;out and proud&#8221; about their successes and their right to the property they&#8217;ve earned, like the Vanderbilts were. Most people have trended toward some sense of partial public ownership of their assets and talents.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not interested in pragmatic views of economics. Pragmatism in this regard leads to attempts to engineer economic outcomes by immorally shackling people. &#8220;To achieve X, we need to interfere with people&#8217;s lives thusly.&#8221; I come at it from the other side: <em>Laissez-faire</em>, or economic liberalism is the only philosophy that doesn&#8217;t prevent humans from living as independent rational beings. Let the chips fall where they may.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
